Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010035712024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/734/2023 DINESH TALUKDAR @ DINESH CH. TALUKDAR S/O LATE HARENDRA NATH TALUKDAR R/O BLOCK D ROOM NO. D-102 HOUSING COMPLEX NATBOMA P.O. and P.S. HATIGAON GUWAHATI 781038 DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM. VERSUS THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LT. AND 2 ORS A COMPANY REGISTERED AND INCORPATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 3 MIDDLETON STREET KALKATA AND ONE OF ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT G.S. ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER GUWAHATI ASSAM. 2:HANIF ALI S/O SAYED ALI RESIDENT OF BAGLIPARA PO JANIA PS AND DIST BARPETA ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 3:MIZUNUR RAHMAN S/O S. ALI RESIDENT OF TALELITOL PS AND DIST BARPETA PO BARPULLAH ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : S I AKAND Advocate for : MR. R ALI (R-2 3) appearing for THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LT. AND 2 ORS Linked Case : DINESH TALUKDAR @ DINESH CH. TALUKDAR VERSUS THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LT. AND 2 ORS B ------------ Advocate for : S I AKAND Advocate for : appearing for THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LT. AND 2 ORS B BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI ORDER Date : 27.05.2025 Heard Mr. S.I. Akand, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mrs. S. Roy, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. R. Ali, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Page No.# 3/3 The present application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 25 days in preferring the connected review petition against the judgment and order dated 04.01.2023 passed by this Court in MAC Appeal No. 468/2019. Mr. Akand, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the delay occurred in filing the connected appeal is not intentional. He further submits that detailed ground of delay has been explained in the petition. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. The delay has been satisfactorily explained by the applicant and the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 did not raise any objection against the prayer of the applicant. Considering all, the delay of 25 days is condoned. The Registry is directed to do the needful and shall register the connected appeal and list it in admission column. With the above observation, I/A stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant