Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88089 (MAD)

Mr. R.Charles v. Tmt. Rashmi Siddharth Zagade, and 2 others

CONT P/3679/2024 · 2025-04-25

S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Contempt Petition No.3679 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.04.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM Contempt Petition No.3679 of 2024 Mr. R. Charles ... Petitioner Vs 1. Tmt. Rashmi Siddharth Zagade The Collector ,Chennai District, Office Of The Collectorate Rajaji Salai George Town, Chennai- 1. 2 Mr. Kannan The Tahsildar, Egmore Taluk, Chennai-31. 3 Mr. S. Prabhakar The Managing Director, The Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, now Named As Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board, rep. By Its Assistant Secretary (plots), No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai- 5 ... Respondents https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Contempt Petition No.3679 of 2024 Prayer : This Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondents for the act of disobedience of the Order of this Court dated 09.06.2023 made in W.P.No.16767 of 2023 . For Petitioner : Mr. J. Jayavenkatraman For respondents : Mr. S.J.Mohamed Sathick, Gov. Advocate, for R1 & R2 : Mrs. Indumathy Venkatesh ORDER The contempt petition has been instituted to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 09.06.2023 passed in W.P.No.16767 of 2023. 2. The learned Government Advocate would submit that the online application seeking patta submitted by the petitioner was scrutinized. 3. Since the petitioner has to secure no objection certificate from the Corporation, the Tahsildar asked the petitioner to produce the certificate enabling him to further consider the patta application. It is needless to state that the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Contempt Petition No.3679 of 2024 petitioner has to comply with the requirements by producing all necessary documents. Merely by filing a contempt petition, petitioner cannot secure patta unless he fullfills the conditions as stipulated under the provisions of the Patta Pass Book Act and Rules. The Common order passed by this Court is only to entertain application seeking patta and decide the same on merits. 4. That being so, the present contempt petition is unnecessary and stands closed. The petitioner is at liberty to submit all the required documents for the purpose of considering his application. 25.04.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No mrp https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Contempt Petition No.3679 of 2024 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. mrp Contempt Petition No.3679 of 2024 25.04.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis