IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4272 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-257 Year-2024 Thana- TILAUTHU District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1. Chunmun Kumar S/O Vijay Rajwar R/O Village- Nimiyadih, P.S- Tilauthu, Distt.- Rohtas. 2. Dipak Rajwar @ Dipak Kumar S/O Vijay Rajwar R/O Village- Nimiyadih, P.S- Tilauthu, Distt.- Rohtas. 3. Ramesh Rajwar @ Ramesh Ram S/O Late Suresh Rajwar R/O Village- Nimiyadih, P.S- Tilauthu, Distt.- Rohtas. 4. Vijay Rajwar @ Vijay Ram S/O Late Jangali Ram @ Jangali Rajwar R/O Village- Nimiyadih, P.S- Tilauthu, Distt.- Rohtas. 5. Radhika Devi W/O Vijay Rajwar R/O Village- Nimiyadih, P.S- Tilauthu, Distt.- Rohtas. 6. Pushpa Devi D/O Vijay Rajwar R/O Village- Nimiyadih, P.S- Tilauthu, Distt.- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 12-02-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 329(3), 352, 351(2), 118(1) and 3(5) of B.N.S. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the petitioner no.5 and 6 are women and the informant alleges that on 22.08.2024 at 10.15 A.M. Chunmun Kumar came to his shop and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4272 of 2025(2) dt.12-02-2025 2/2 started abusing, on protest, he called the accused persons including the petitioners, who assaulted him, his wife and daughter. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant with general and omnibus allegation of assault. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that allegation of assault is not specific. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Tilauthu P.S. Case No.257/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T