1 2025:CGHC:10077 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 269 of 2025 1 - Smt. Sushma Prajapati W/o Shri Naveen Chandra Minz Aged About 44 Years Work- ing As Staff Nurse At Medical College Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Usha Ekka W/o Shri Arun Kumar Kujur Aged About 46 Years Working As Staff Nurse At Medical College Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 3 - Smt. Anita Lakra W/o Shri Sidus Lakra Aged About 48 Years Working As Staff Nurse At Medical College Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 4 - Smt. Satyawati Gupta W/o Shri Satyanarayan Gupta Aged About 40 Years Working As Staff Nurse At Medical College Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 5 - Smt. Meenu Rani Vishwakarma W/o Shri V.K. Vishwakarma Aged About 43 Years Working As Staff Nurse At Medical College Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 6 - Smt. Anjana Linda W/o Shri Ranjeet Abit Linda Aged About 42 Years Working As Staff Nurse At Medical College Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 7 - Smt. Sindu Rajwade W/o Shri Mukesh Kumar Aged About 36 Years Working As Staff Nurse At Medical College Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - Shri Amit Katariya, Secretary, Department Of Medical Education, Govt. Of Chhattis- garh, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.). 2 - Shri U.S. Painkra, Director, Department Of Medical Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners : Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate For Respondents : None --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 28.02.2025 1. The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of order of this Court dated 14.07.2024 passed in WPS No. 4574 of 2023. 2 Vide order dated 14.07.2024, this Court has passed the following order/direction:- “ Let a decision be taken in this regard be taken within an outer limit of 60 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the order of this court has duly been complied with. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it transpires that there is no willful disobedience on the part of the respondents. The order of this court has duly been complied with. 4. Subsequently, the present contempt petition against the respondents is closed and is accordingly disposed of. sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge alfiza