Y MUNIRAJAPPA v. THE COMMISSIONER BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
WP/28213/2018 · 2025-10-29
R Nataraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88052 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88052 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43075 WP No. 28213 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 28213 OF 2018 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN:
Y. MUNIRAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, SON OF LATE YAMANNA, RESIDING AT KATHA NO.174-1-174/1 HORAMAVU GRAMATHANA, HORAMAVU VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU-560043 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHARATH M., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. C. SHANKAR REDDY S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE J.C.ROAD, BENGALURU-560002
2.
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BENGALURU, MAHANAGARA PALIKE, NO.408 SC.R.M NAGAR MAIN ROAD, HORAMAVU SUB DIVISION, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, NEAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU-560016 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KARTHIKEYAN B.S., ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2)
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43075 WP No. 28213 of 2018
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENTS BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 15.09.2017 AS PER ANNEXURE-H PASSED IN APPEAL NO.791/2011 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL WHICH WAS FILED AGAINST THE NOTICES AND ORDERS DATED 12.08.2011, 17.08.2011 AND 02.09.2011 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT REGARDING PROPERTY NUMBERS 174 AND 174/1 OF HORAMAVU, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK AND SET ASIDE THE SAME AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the petitioner has expired and that he is not aware of the particulars of the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner.
2. Hence, the petition is dismissed as abated.
Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 62