Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:145808 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12138 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohd. Shahid Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shibli Naseem Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vivek Kumar Singh Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:-
"a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent No. 3 to consider the case of the petitioner and grant him appointment in place of his deceased father under Dying in Harness Scheme without any further delay so that the justice may be done. b. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.3 to decide the representation dated 03.04.2025 moved by the mother of the petitioner (Performa Respondent No.4) within stipulated period by a reasoned and speaking order so that the justice may be done; otherwise the petitioners shall suffer irreparable loss and injury."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3 vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but have not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents, Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3- University, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 and
3. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.3 within 10 days from today.
After receiving the said representation, respondent no.3, the Registrar, Veer Bahadur Singh Purvanchal University, Jaunpur, district-Jaunpur is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 23.8.2025 Radhika (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad