HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 28526 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard Sri Ashish Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shwetashwa Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 to 4 and learned Standing counsel for the State-respondents. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents pointed out that present writ petition is not maintainable as lease deed dated 29.4.2008 in question had not been challenged. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid fact and submitted that the present writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the lease deed dated 29.4.2008. 4. Accordingly, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. So far as the liberty is concerned, it is open for the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law and for that no liberty is required from the Court. October 6, 2025 A.P. Pandey Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Singh, Santosh Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Anand Tiwari, Manoj Kumar Singh, Swetashwa Agarwal (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Ram Bachan Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad