Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8803 (CHH)

RAIPUR INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES COLLEGE OF NURSING v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1188/2021 · 2025-06-22

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:26831 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1188 of 2021 1 - Raipur Institute Of Medical Sciences College Of Nursing Office At RIMS Campus, Bhansoj Road, Nh-6, Village Godhi Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Through Its Authorized Signatory, Krishna Kumar Vadhwa, S/o Shri M.R. Vadhwa, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Rims Campus, Bhansoj Road, Nh-6, Village Godhi Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Director Medical Education Old Nurses Hostel, Dks-Bhawan Compound, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chhattisgarh Nurses Registration Council Old Nurses Hostel, Director Health Services, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Indian Nursing Council Through Its Secretary Indian Nursing Council, 8th Floor, NBCC Center, Plot No. 2, Community Center Okhla, Phase-1, New Delhi., District : New Delhi, Delhi ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Pragati Pandey, Advocate For Respondent No. 3 For Respondent No. 4 : : Mr. Vikas Dubey, Advocate Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Deputy Solicitor General Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 23/06/2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed as order impugned has been withdrawn by the respondent authorities and Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 the petitioner was permitted to take admission by virtue of interim order; thus, she would pray to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to revive if cause of actions subsists. 2. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondents would not oppose the submission made by counsel for the petitioner. 3. Recording the submission made by counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti