HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4396 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. Bushra Mariyam, learned counsel for the opposite party. 2. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 22.8.2025, Ms. Bushra Mariyam, learned counsel for the opposite party has produced the instruction dated 29.8.2025, which is taken on record. On the basis of instruction, she informed that writ Court vide order dated 11.10.2023 has given liberty that in case condition so mentioned in paragraph 7 is not fulfilled, interim protection granted shall seize to operate and the landlord-respondent will be at liberty to get the decree executed. She next submitted that decree holder is given an application No.86C on 28.5.2022 upon which objection was invited. She further submitted that as the Court has given liberty, therefore, opposite party has only proceeded to decide the application in terms of order dated 11.10.2023, therefore, no case for contempt is made out. Under such facts and circumstances, as on date no contempt is made out and contempt application is disposed of with direction to concerned opposite party to proceed in the matter strictly in light of order of writ Court dated 11.10.2023 and before proceeding for execution, he shall pass reasoned order for the same in terms of order dated 11.10.2023. September 11, 2025 Junaid Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Praveen Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Tawrej Ahmed Siddiqui .....Applicant(s) Sri Ishwar Saran Kanaujiya, Judge Small Causes Court .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JUNAID AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad