Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87999 (ALL)

HASEEN v. STATE OF U.P.

NA528/31611/2025 · 2025-08-31

Raj Beer Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 31611 of 2025 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. This application under Section - 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as 'BNSS') has been filed seeking following relief :- "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'bie Court may graciously be pleased to allow the present application and direct the learned court below to accept the personal bond and two sureties in one case treating the same for two cases i.e. (1). Case Crime No.85 of 2025, Under Section 303(2), 317(2) B.N.S., Police Station Jansath, District Muzaffar Nagar. (2) Case Crime No.86 of 2025, Under Section - 303 (2) B.N.S. Police Station Jansath, District Muzaffar Nagar, otherwise the applicant shall suffer irreparable loss and injury. And/or pass such other and further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the fact and circumstances of the case." 3. It was submitted by learned counsel that applicant has been granted bail in the aforesaid two cases subject to condition of furnishing a personal bond and two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. The applicant is unable to arrange separate sureties for both of the aforesaid two cases and due to that reason he could not come out on bail. The aforesaid two cases are pending in District Court, Muzaffar Nagar. It was further submitted that in view of these facts and circumstances, the applicant may be permitted to furnish one personal bond and two sureties in Case Crime No.85 of 2025, under Sections - 303(2), 317(2) B.N.S., Police Station - Jansath, District - Muzaffar Nagar, which may hold good in the remaining Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Aslam Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Haseen .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) one case against the applicant, which has been mentioned above. 4. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that applicant shall be allowed to furnish a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned in Case Crime No.85 of 2025, under Sections - 303(2), 317(2) B.N.S. Police Station - Jansath, District - Muzaffar Nagar, if he has already been granted bail, and he would submit personal bond in the second Case Crime No.86 of 2025 and the sureties submitted in Case Crime No. 85 of 2025 would hold good in the Case Crime No.86 of 2025 against the applicant, if he has already been granted on bail in that case. The photocopies of the sureties bonds submitted in Case Crime No. 85 of 2025, be submitted in Case Crime No.86 of 2025. Thus, after submission of bail bonds in Case Crime No. 85 of 2025, the applicant would not be required to submit separate sureties bonds in aforesaid Case Crime No.86 of 2025, which has been mentioned above. 5. The application under Section 528 BNSS is disposed of in above terms. September 1, 2025 S Rawat NA528 No. 31611 of 2025 2 (Raj Beer Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHOBHIT RAWAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad