Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8798 (ALL)

SMT. SEEMA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/565/2025 · 2025-02-13

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:20937 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 565 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Seema Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lal Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner has prayed for following substantial relief: "I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding or direction in the nature of Mandamus direct the respondent no.2 Director Krishi Nideshalaya Government of U.P. Lucknow to provide the entire family pension to the petitioner and also direct the respondent no. 2 to decide the representation dated 17.10.2024 which is still pending." 2. It transpires that husband of petitioner Vinod Kumar Verma was posted on the post of Up Krishi Nideshak, Kanpur Dehat died in harness on 21.12.2006. Thereafter, petitioner made representation to respondent No. 2 for payment of family pension on 17.10.2024, however, no decision has been taken on the aforesaid representation till date. 3. Learned Standing Counsel does not have any objection in the event direction is issued to the respondent No. 2 to consider and dispose of the pending representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law. 4. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondent No. 2 to consider and dispose of the pending representation of the petitioner for payment of family pension, within a period of three months from the production of certified copy of the order. 5. Needless to add that the order to be passed must be reasoned and speaking one. Order Date :- 13.2.2025 Nadeem Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad