APHC010096492022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 460/2022 Between: 1. KAKARA SRINIVASA RAO, , S/O LATE APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 63-5-10, INDIRA COLONY-II, PART OF JANATHA COLONY, MALKAPURAM POST, VISHAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. RACHARLA KOTESWARA RAO, S/O LATE SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 63-5-12, INDIRA COLONY-II, PART OF JANATHA COLONY, MALKAPURAM POST, VISHAKHAPATNAM 2. SMT RACHARLA UMADEVI, W/O KOTESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 62, R/O D.NO. 63-5-12, INDIRA COLONY-II, PART OF JANATHA COLONY, MALKAPURAM POST, VISHAKHAPATNAM 3. RACHARLA ANILKUMAR, S/O KOTESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. R/O D.NO. 63-5-12, INDIRA COLONY-II, PART OF JANATHA COLONY, MALKAPURAM POST, VISHAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to aggrieved by the order dated 18-01-2022 in I.A NO.14/2021 IN A.S NO.161/2020, on the file of the VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vishakhapatnam for the among other IA NO: 1 OF 2022 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in A.S. No. 161 of 2020 on the file VII Addl. District and Sessions Judge at Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the above Civil Revision case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T D PANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 460/2022 ORDER: The present civil revision petition is preferred, aggrieved by the order dated 18-01-2022 in I.A No.14/2021 IN A.S No.161/2020, on the file of the VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vishakhapatnam. 2. It is brought to the notice of this Court by Ms. D.Gayathri, learned counsel representing Sri T.D.Phani Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the present petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date : 04.08.2025. UPS 4 150 HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.460 of 2022 Date : 04.08.2025 UPS