- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54293-DB MFA No. 6600 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6600 OF 2019 (FC) BETWEEN: SRI RAVIKUMAR T S/O THIPPESWAMY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS LANCENAIK IN INDIAN LAND ARMY ARMY NO.15333143L REGIMENT HEAD QUARTERS 4, ENGINEER REGIMENT, C/O 99, APO, 24, PARGAUM DISTRICT KOLKAT - 914004 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SIDDESWARA N K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. KAVITHA H W/O RAVIKUMAR T AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS HOMEMAKER 2. KUM. R RACHANA ACCORDING TO 1ST RESPONDENT Digitally signed by K G RENUKAMBA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54293-DB MFA No. 6600 of 2019 SHE IS D/O RAVIKUMAR T BUT THE APPELLANT HAS DENIED THE SAME IN THE NOTE AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, SINCE THE 2ND RESPONDENT IS A MINOR DULY REPD., BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT. KAVITHA, 1ST RESPONDENT, BOTH ARE RESIDING UNDER THE CARE & CUSTODY OF SRI HALAPPA S/O DURGAPPA R/O 1ST CROSS, ASHRAYA COLONY HARIHARA TOWN & TALUK DAVANGERE DISTRICT – 577 601 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T., ADVOCATE) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF FAMILY COURT ACT,1984, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.07.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.35/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, DAVANAGERE, IN PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT WITH COST FOR MAINTENANCE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54293-DB MFA No. 6600 of 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) The office report is that no memo has been filed for having deposited a sum of Rs.1,20,000/- within four weeks and deposit of a sum of Rs.5,000/- per month before this Court which was directed by means of an order dated 28.08.2019. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant Sri. N. K. Siddeswara has stated that he has not received any instructions from the appellant and repeated attempts to contact him have yielded no result. It is further stated that the counsel who appeared for the appellant in the District Court has also died during the period of COVID-19 and therefore, he is without any instructions. 3. This appeal is therefore dismissed. It shall however be open for the learned counsel for the appellant to - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54293-DB MFA No. 6600 of 2019 move an application for recall of this order if he receives instructions. Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE KG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19