- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51588 WP No. 13667 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 13667 OF 2023 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. NAWSHAD S/O ABDUL KHADHAR AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.1-320, RAMAL KATTE HOUSE THUMBE VILLAGE AND POST, BANTWAL TQ, MANGALORE D.K., DISTRICT - 574 143 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANIL KUMAR .D., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. ADHARSHA VIVIDHODDESHA SHAHAKARA SANGHA LTD DARBE PUTTUR PUTTER - 574 202 D.K. DISTRICT, REP. BY: THE SALE OFFICER / GENERAL MANAGER 2. THE ASST. REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY SUB-DIVISION, PUTTUR PUTTUR - 574 202 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND ISSUE DIRECT TO RESPONDENT BANK TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DTD 23.6.2023 Digitally signed by PRASHANTH N V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51588 WP No. 13667 of 2023 RESPECTIVELY UNDER ANNX-E. AND SET ASIDE THE SALE NOTICE DTD 23.6.2023 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT UNDER ANNX-D. AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation even when the matter is passed over twice and again called. The order sheet dated 01.12.2025 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation in the morning session as well in the afternoon session. The matter is listed for seventh time to comply with office objections. Still, the office objections are not complied with. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford one more opportunity, list finally on 08.12.2025." The petition is of the year 2023. Even though the matter is listed for eleventh time, the office objections are not - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51588 WP No. 13667 of 2023 complied with. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE BH CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2