AT CHANDIGARH (118) CR-5251-2025 Date of Decision:-06.08.2025 HARBANS LAL … Petitioner Versus RAM SARUP ... Respondent -.- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate for the petitioner. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral) 1. The revisionist has filed this revision petition for quashing of order dated 24.07.2025 (Annexure P-6) passed by learned Additional District Judge, Sirsa whereby the stay granted in favour of the revisionist has not been extended and the Executing Court has issued conditional warrants against revisionist for 11.08.2025. 2. It is settled law that stay order once granted is deemed to have been extended till the same is vacated by passing a speaking order. Accordingly, the omission in the order dated 24.07.2025 is causing serious prejudice to the revisionist and is a material mistake on the part of the learned Appellate Court. Relief claimed by the revisionist would not be served by quashing the order, rather an implied ‘extension of stay’ be read in the order and accordingly revision petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. GAURAV SOROT 2025.08.06 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-5251-2025 3. construed as opinion on the merits of the case. Same are purely confined to the present controversy and deliberations. ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 06.08.2025 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2025.08.06 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document