M/S ANANTHARAJA CHARITABLE TRUST v. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES
WP/32790/2024 · 2025-07-16
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87952 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87952 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26484 WP No. 32790 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO.32790 OF 2024 (T-IT)
BETWEEN:
M/S. ANANTHARAJA CHARITABLE TRUST VIDYANIKETAN PUBLIC SCHOOL KAUP, UDUPI DISTRICT KARNATAKA-574106 REP. BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE SRI K.P. ACHARYA S/O LATE SRI ANANTHA ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI CHANDRASEKHAR V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES, THROUGH THE CHAIRPERSON, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI ARAVIND V. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED
ORDER IN
ORDER F.NO.197/42/2023-ITA-1 DATED 06.06.2024 PASSED U/S 119(2)(b) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 AND HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26484 WP No. 32790 of 2024
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; a. Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the Impugned Order in
order F.No.197/42/2023-ITA-1 dated 06.06.2024 passed u/s 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and herein marked as Annexure-A.
b. And pass such other orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.”
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the application filed by the petitioner under Section 192(b) of the Income Tax Act 1961 has been dismissed by the respondent on the ground that the medical certificate which had been produced along with the said application did not specifically disclose that due to the affliction mentioned in the medical certificate, the petitioner was unable to file his returns within the timeframe. A copy of the medical certificate has been placed on record before this Court.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26484 WP No. 32790 of 2024
3. The afflictions indicated in the said report only indicate normal afflictions like hypertension, ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism and Parkinson, there is nothing which is indicated in the said medical certificate that those afflictions were such that the petitioner was prevented from carrying out the necessary activities.
4. Considering that the petitioner is 75 years and that by filing an application under Section 192(b), what the petitioner intends to achieve is only to place the returns and documents on record which would not in any manner adversely affect the interest in revenue, infact the revenue would receive the tax due voluntarily paid by the petitioner.
5. The revenue would have to consider the documents which have been placed on record in accordance with law and determine the tax liability of the petitioner. I am of the considered opinion that, these kind of matters the revenue is required to be more equitable
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26484 WP No. 32790 of 2024
and exercise the jurisdiction under Section 192(b) more liberally by condoning the delay where it can, so that the assessment could be completed in a proper manner in accordance with law, more so when the assessee has approached the authority to pay the tax. As such, I pass the following;
ORDER i. The writ petition is allowed. ii. A certiorari is issued, the impugned order bearing F.No.197/42/2023-ITA-1 dated 06.06.2024 at Annexure-A is set aside. iii. The application under Section 192(b) of the Income Tax Act 1961 is allowed delay is condoned.
The matter is remitted to respondent to consider the returns and documents filed by the petitioner in accordance with law. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
SR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41