2025:HHC:8100 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Exe. Pt. No. 131 of 2025 Decided on : 28.03.2025 Rakesh Kumar. …Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rahul, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Rahul, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. He submits that needful will be done, within a period of three weeks from today. His statement is taken on record. 2. In view of the above, this execution petition is disposed of with the direction that the judgment in issue, execution of which is being sought, be definitely complied with, 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:8100 within a period of three weeks from today, failing which, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 28, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)