Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87938 (KAR)

SRI CHANDRASHEKAR A H v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/37678/2025 · 2025-12-15

K S Hemalekha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53078 WP No. 37678 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 37678 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: 1. SRI CHANDRASHEKAR A H S/O HANUMANTHA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT NO. 91, ARUVANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI BANGALORE RURAL 562 110. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHARAN N.MAJAGE., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE 560 001. 2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER KHANIJA BHAVANA RACE COURSE ROAD BENGALURU 560001. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER 2 KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, CFC BUILDING MAHARSHI ARAVIND BHAVAN, 1ST FLOOR NRUPATUNGA ROAD BENGALURU 560001. Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53078 WP No. 37678 of 2025 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.HARISHA K S, AGA FOR R1: SRI H L PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE GENERAL AWARD BEARING NO. KIADB/LAQ/2038/2023-2024 DATED 06.06.2023 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 3 IN RESPECT OF LAND IN SY.NO.101 MEASURING 4 ACRE 8 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT DODDAGOLLAHALLI, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED, AS PER ANNEXURE-C AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER Learned AGA accepts notice for respondent No.1. 2. Sri H.L.Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel accepts notice for respondents No.2 and 3. 3. The petitioner has approached this Court challenging the General Award dated 06.06.2023 passed by the 3rd respondent in respect of the petitioner’s land in Sy.No.101, measuring 4 acres 8 guntas, situated at Doddagollahalli, Kundana Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru Rural District. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53078 WP No. 37678 of 2025 4. Heard learned counsel Sri.Sharan N.Majage for petitioner, learned Additional Government Advocate Sri.Harisha K.S. for respondent No.1 and learned counsel Sri.H.L.Pradeep Kumar for respondents No.2 and 3. Perused the material on record. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the compensation was earlier determined through a consent agreement entered into between the petitioner and the State under Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (for short “the KIAD Act”). However, respondent No.3 subsequently, passed the impugned General Award on 06.06.2023, which according to the petitioner could not have been issued once a consent award was agreed upon. He further submits that as per the Government Order dated 23.02.2021 (Annexure-D), the extent of developed land is increased to 10781 sq. ft. per acre, and therefore, being the lawful owner of the acquired land whose katha stands in his name, the petitioner is entitled to such allotment of - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53078 WP No. 37678 of 2025 developed land in the industrial layout formed by respondent-KIADB. 6. Learned counsel appearing for respondent- KIADB does not dispute the existence of the Government Order dated 23.02.2021, which governs the allotment of developed land, in lieu of monetary compensation. However, he submits that the petitioner has not yet submitted any representation before the competent authority, seeking such allotment. It is further submitted that if the petitioner submits an appropriate representation, the same will be duly considered in accordance with law. 7. Submission is recorded. 8. Accordingly, this Court pass the following: ORDER (i) The writ petition is allowed. (ii) The impugned General Award dated 06.06.2023 assed by respondent No.3 is hereby quashed. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53078 WP No. 37678 of 2025 (iii) The petitioner is granted liberty to submit a fresh representation to KIADB, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Upon receipt of such representation, the respondent- KIADB shall consider the same in terms of Government Order dated 23.02.2021 as per Annexure-D and pass appropriate orders. (iv) The said consideration by the KIADB shall be within eight weeks from the date of submission of the representation by the petitioner. (v) The respondent-KIADB is at liberty to withdraw the amount, if any, deposited before the Competent Court. (vi) In the event, if there is no consensus arrived for grant of developed land, the petitioner is entitled for compensation under Section 29(2) of the KIAD Act. Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA HA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 21