Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87926 (KAR)

SRI. C. P. NAVEEN KUMAR v. SRI. S. M. PRAMOD

WP/24469/2025 · 2025-08-18

M Nagaprasanna

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31929 WP No. 24469 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 24469 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. C.P.NAVEEN KUMAR, S/O N.PRABHU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT ANNAPURNESHWARI LAYOUT, KONANKUNTE POST, BENGALURU – 560 062. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHARATH S.GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. S.M.PRAMOD, S/O MR. MALLIKARJUNAPPA C.S., AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.15, 25TH MAIN, J.P.NAGAR, 1ST PHASE, BENGALURU – 560 078. 2. SRI. S.RAGHUNATH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT NO.306, 17TH ‘C’ MAIN, 3RD BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 010. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO GRANT POLICE PROTECTION DIRECTING THE PUTTENAHALLI POLICE STATION IN IMPLEMENTING THE EXPARTE ORDER OF TEMPORARY INJUNCTION GRANTED IN O.S NO.938/2023 VIDE ORDER DATED 23.02.2023, VIDE ANNEXURE-C BY XXII ACC AND SJ BENGALURU ON IA 1 AND 2. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31929 WP No. 24469 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Heard Sri.Sharath S Gowda, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and have perused the material on record. 2. Petitioner is the plaintiff, institutes a suit in O.S.No.938/2023. He is before this Court at this juncture, alleging that notwithstanding grave urgency in the matter, application filed before the concerned Court seeking grant of police protection is adjourned to 01.09.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that police protection in the case at hand is imperative to implement the order of injunction that is in his favour. 3. In the light of the application pending consideration at the hands of the concerned Court, I deem it appropriate to direct the concerned Court to hear the parties and pass necessary orders on the application within an outer limit of one week from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Since the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31929 WP No. 24469 of 2025 matter is adjourned to 01.09.2025, the petitioner-plaintiff is at liberty to file necessary memo seeking advancement of the case after serving the memo on the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 4. In the light of the aforesaid circumstances and the direction issued to the concerned Court to dispose the application, the parties shall not precipitate the matter qua the construction till the concerned Court dispose the said application. 5. In the light of the aforesaid circumstance, the jurisdictional police shall not precipitate the matter with regard to the construction of the property. With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CBC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 10 CT:SS