M/S MENZIES AVIATION BOBBA BENGALURU PVT LTD v. THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR
CA/273/2021 · 2025-11-13
Jyoti M
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87912 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87912 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46285 CA No. 273 of 2021 In COP No.143 of 2011 And 193 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 273 OF 2021 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 143 OF 2011 AND 193 OF 2011 BETWEEN:
M/S. MENZIES AVIATION BOBBA BENGALURU PVT. LTD., KEMPEGOWDA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BENGALURU.
R.SRINIVAS, MANAGER CUSTOMER SERVICES MENZIES AVIATION BOBBA (BENGALURU) PVT. LTD., (AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE) …APPLICANT (BY SRI. KADIWAL V.P., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, M/S. DECCAN CARGO AND EXPRESS LOGISTIC PVT. LTD., RAHEJA TOWERS, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. JAGADEESHGOUD PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR OL)
THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER RULE 177 READ WITH RULE 9 OF THE COMPANY'S COURT RULES, 1959 WITH SECTION 5 OF THE LIMITATION ACT.
Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46285 CA No. 273 of 2021 In COP No.143 of 2011 And 193 of 2011
THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of applicant, either personally or through video conferencing. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Jagadeeshgoud Patil., counsel for the Official Liquidator has appeared in person. The captioned application is listed today for orders regarding non-filing of acknowledgment for having served the copy of application to Official Liquidator. As could be seen from the Application papers, the Application is filed in 2021. Now we are in November 2025. The Application is pending from four years. Despite granting sufficient time, the applicant has not filed the acknowledgment for having served the copy of application to Official Liquidator. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the applicant, either personally or
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46285 CA No. 273 of 2021 In COP No.143 of 2011 And 193 of 2011
through video conferencing. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Company Application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE TKN,KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11