RSA-3613- IN THE HIG 222 Anil Kumar Meera and o CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP plaintiff/app the Courts b was dismisse application f co-ordinate listed as ma 06.10.2017, 05.03.2020, -2015 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o umar and others Versus and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Jitender Nara, Advocate for Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate fo Mr. Vineet Chaudhary, Advoca Service of respondent No. 2 dis vide order dated 25.04.2016. Respondent No.3 already proce vide order dated 25.04.2016. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present regular second app /appellants against the concurrent ju urts below whereby the suit for decl ismissed by both the Courts below. The matter pertains to the ye ation filed under Section 5 of the Lim inate Bench of this Court vide order d Perusal of the order-sheet(s) sh as many as 10 times thereafter, i.e. 017, 09.04.2018, 11.02.2019, 2020, 21.11.2022 and 14.02.2023, out ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-3613-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.02.2025 .… Appellants .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA ate for cate for the appellant. dvocate for respondent No. 1. . 2 dispensed with proceeded ex parte nd appeal has been preferred by the rent judgments and decrees of both declaration filed by the plaintiffs the year 2015 and notice of the e Limitation Act, was issued by a rder dated 31.07.2015. t(s) shows that the appeal has been r, i.e. on 25.04.2016, 19.04.2017, 019, 23.07.2019, 05.12.2019, 3, out of which on 04 dates i.e. on the both tiffs RISHU KATARIA 2025.02.10 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-3613- 06.10.2017, adjourned at on 02 date representatio counsel appe have exhibit litigation. It Court has be the interest o utterly casua appellants n present matt dismiss the s 07.02.2025 rishu -2015 (O&M) -2- 2017, 11.02.2019, 23.07.2019 and ned at the request of learned counsel 2 dates i.e. on 09.04.2018 and entation on behalf of appellants. E el appearing for the appellants prays fo A bare reading of the above fa exhibited an utterly casual attitude in ion. It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppo terest of justice. On the other hand, th casual and careless approach. It is cle ants nor their counsel are seriously t matter. Thus, this Court is left wi the same for non-prosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable and 21.11.2022, the case was ounsel for the appellants; whereas, and 14.02.2023 there was no nts. Even today, learned proxy rays for an adjournment. ove facts shows that the appellants tude in their pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the g opportunities to the appellants in and, the appellants have adopted an It is clear that neither the applicants- riously interested in pursuing the left with no other option except to any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No ts sent the ts in d an the t to RISHU KATARIA 2025.02.10 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.