Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87898 (MAD)

Muruganantham v. The State rep by

CRL OP/23848/2025 · 2025-08-29

N Sathish Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.M.P.No.23848 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 29.08.2025 CORAM THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR CRL OP No.23848 of 2025 Muruganantham ... Petitioner Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Coimbatore District. ... Respondent (Crime No.38 of 2021) PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to release the petitioner on bail in S.C.No.102 of 2022 on the file of Principal Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act. For Petitioner : M/s.S.Sridevi For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 29.10.2024, for the alleged offence under Sections 9 (m) and 10 of POCSO Act, 2012, in Crime No.38 of 2021, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.23848 of 2025 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was initially arrested on 23.12.2021 and the bail was granted on 21.02.2022. He further submits that the petitioner was released on bail by the trial Court on 23.02.2022. However, a Non-Bailable Warrant was issued against the petitioner on 15.02.2024 for his non appearance, and he was subsequently arrested on 29.10.2024. He further submits that the petitioner is willing to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submits that the case pertains to the year 2021. Due to the non-appearance of the petitioner, an NBW issued on 15.02.2024, and the same was executed on 29.10.2024. He further submits that out of fourteen witnesses, eleven have already been examined and only three witnesses are to be examined. 4.Heard the learned counsels on either side and perused the records. 5.It is seen that the petitioner is in the habit of jumping bail and not co- operating with the trial. If he is released bail, there is a likelihood of his absconding once again. Therefore, at this stage, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the case in 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.23848 of 2025 Crime No.38 of 2021 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 29.08.2025 ep To State Rep. by 1.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Coimbatore District. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.23848 of 2025 N.SATHISH KUMAR, J . ep CRL OP No.23848 of 2025 29.08.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis