Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87877 (ALL)

TEJ BHAWAN SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 20 OTHERS

WRIC/28485/2025 · 2025-08-22

Y K Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:146256 Court No. - 36 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28485 of 2025 Petitioner :- Tej Bhawan Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 20 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Singh Yadav,Sanju Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Azad Rai,C.S.C. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. Sri Ajay Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and Sri Rajan Chauhan, holding brief of Sri Azar Rai, learned counsel appearing for the Gram Sabha. The present petition has been filed, seeking a direction to respondent No.2/Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj to decided the Case No.323 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.C202402000000323) (Taj Bhawan Singh Vs. Uday Singh and others) filed under Section 207 of the U P Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously and within a stipulated period. It is submitted that the appeal has been filed against an order passed under Section 116 of the U P Revenue Code, 2006. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to the order sheet of the case, a copy whereof has been appended to the writ petition, to point out that although several dates have been fixed but for some reason or the other, the matter has been adjourned and the delay in disposal of the case is causing undue hardship to the petitioner. Accordingly, a prayer is made for a direction to the court/authority concerned to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously and at an early date. Learned counsel for the State-Respondents has no objection to the prayer made. Having regard to the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of with an observation that the court/authority concerned would make an endeavor to decide the aforesaid case, which is stated to be pending before it, preferably within a period of six months, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, provided there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 23.8.2025 RKK/- (Dr Y K Srivastava, J) Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad