CWP-22583-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 120 DEVENDER KUMAR STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR Present: Mr. Prashant Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA CM-11835-CWP For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. dated 07.02.2025 service book are subject to all just exceptions. Main Case The petition has been filed, respondents to sanction second ACP petitioner, and release arrears thereof 2. Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that Directorate has process the petitioner’s case for grant of benefits claimed in the instant petition, and decision in this regard wi benefits as per his entitlement will be released. 3. In view thereof, the petition is disposed of respondent/Director, Secondary Education 2025(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Decided On: DEVENDER KUMAR Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Prashant Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J.(Oral) CWP-2025 For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. 07.02.2025 passed by Principal Secretary to Government of Haryana are taken on record as Annexures P subject to all just exceptions. The petition has been filed, inter alia to sanction second ACP scale with effect from , and release all consequential service thereof. Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that Directorate has already instructed the concerned District Education Officer to process the petitioner’s case for grant of benefits claimed in the instant and decision in this regard will soon benefits as per his entitlement will be released. In view thereof, the petition is disposed of respondent/Director, Secondary Education, to finally decide IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22583-2025(O&M) Decided On: 20.08.2025 ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) . JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Prashant Singh Chauhan, Advocate Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Order passed by Principal Secretary to Government of Haryana, and as Annexures P-21 and P-22, respectively, inter alia, seeking a direction to the scale with effect from 01.07.2015 to the service and retiral benefits, including Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that the instructed the concerned District Education Officer to process the petitioner’s case for grant of benefits claimed in the instant soon be taken whereupon the due benefits as per his entitlement will be released. In view thereof, the petition is disposed of directing the second to finally decide the petitioner’s Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Order and respectively, a direction to the the including the instructed the concerned District Education Officer to process the petitioner’s case for grant of benefits claimed in the instant the due directing the second the petitioner’s Aman Dua 2025.08.26 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-22583-2025 case and release a period of three months. 4. In case the petitioner remains aggrieved after the decision taken by the second respondent, he will be at liberty to agitate his rights. 5. In case the the second respondent 20.08.2025 Ad Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? 2025(O&M) -2- and release the admissible benefits to him a period of three months. In case the petitioner remains aggrieved after the decision taken by the second respondent, he will be at liberty to agitate his rights. In case the direction is not complied second respondent shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? him in accordance with law within In case the petitioner remains aggrieved after the decision taken by the second respondent, he will be at liberty to agitate his rights. complied within the stipulated period, ,000 to the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No in accordance with law within In case the petitioner remains aggrieved after the decision taken within the stipulated period, Aman Dua 2025.08.26 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document