- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50035 CRP No. 27 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 27 OF 2021 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI. SHANTILAL S/O MISRIMAL AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS REPRESENTED BY HIS LR'S 1(A). SMT. PUSHPA JAIN W/O LATE SHANTILAL AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS RESIDING AT G-4, "SHANKESHWARA EMERALD", NO.10, BULL TEMPLE "A" CROSS ROAD, CHAMRAJPET, BANGALORE - 560 018. 1(B). SMT. SHEEL A P. MUTHA D/O LATE SHANTILAL W/O PRADEEP MUTHA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.32, 1ST FLOOR, RAVIPRABHA, SUBRAMANYA SWAMY TEMPLE STREET KUMARA PARK, BANGALORE NORTH SESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE - 560 020. 1(C). SRI. NARESH JAIN, S/O LATE SHANTILAL, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING AT G-4, "SHANKESHWARA EMERALD", NO.10, BULL TEMPLE "A" CROSS ROAD, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50035 CRP No. 27 of 2021 CHAMRAJPET, BANGALORE - 560 018. 1(D). SMT. SHILPA MANISH BOHRA, D/O LATE SHANTILAL W/O MANISH BOHRA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS PLOT NO.507, 5TH FLOOR KAMAR BUILDING, PATTHE BAPURAO MARG GRANT ROAD, MUMBAI - 400 007. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K, ADVOCATE FOR LR'S OF DECEASED) AND: ANIL KUMAR S/O AMARCHAND AGED 30 YEARS NO.390, ALANKAR BUILDING BASETTYPET, CHICKPET CROSS BANAGALORE - 560 053. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. N. JAI PRAKASH RAO, ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 02.11.2020 PASSED ON IA NO.2 IN OS NO.2694/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE XVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-16) DISMISSING THE IA NO.2 FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11 R/W. ORDER 2 RULE 2 R/W. SEC.151 OF CPC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50035 CRP No. 27 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under: "The petitioner submits that the above petition had been filed against the order of the Hon’ble Trial Court on an application filed by the petitioner under Order 7 rule 11 of the CPC. The petitioner submits that during the pendency of the above case, the Hon’ble Trial Court has posted the matter for evidence. Hence, it is prayed that this Hon’ble court be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above petition with a liberty to urge all contentions before the Hon’ble Trial Court, in the interest of justice.” Placing the memo on record, revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30