- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45300 CRL.P No. 13425 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13425 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. RAVIKUMAR H G @ MOHAN AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O HOSADODDIGOVINDAIAH 2. SAVITHRAMMA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, W/O LAKKAPPA 3. GANESH LAKKAPPA @ RAVIKUMAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O LAKKAPPA 4. LAKSHMI @ SOWBHAGYA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, W/O GANESH LAKKAPPA PETITIONERS 1 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT: NO.66, SRINIDHI ASHRITHA, 7TH CROSS, FLAT NO.302, CHIKKALLASANDRA, RAMANJANEYA NAGAR, VTC, BENGALURU-560 0061 6. MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS S/O HANUMANTHAPPA NO.705, 1ST B MAIN ROAD, 8TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45300 CRL.P No. 13425 of 2023 BENGALURU CITY-560070 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. DEVARAJ N.,ADVOCATE, ABSENT) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY GOVINDARAJANAGAR POLICE STATION, REP BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001 2. RAJESHWARI AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, D/O KRISHNAMURTHY NO.27, 2ND CROSS, HUCCHAPPA LAYOUT, S.B.G NAGAR, MOODALAPALYA BENGALURU-560072 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.RAJAT SUBRAMANYAM., HCGP FOR R1; SRI.P.BHUVANESHWARI.,ADVOCATE FOR R2;) THIS CRL.PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET IN C.C.NO.8977/2023 ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.257/2022 REGISTERED BY THE GOVINDARAJNAGAR POLICE STATION AGAINST THE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 323,498-A,494,504,506 R/W 34 OF IPC AND SEC.3 AND 4 OF SOWRY PROHIBITION ACT PENDING BEFORE THE HON'BLE XXVI ADDL.CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU CITY AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45300 CRL.P No. 13425 of 2023 ORAL ORDER On 19.09.2025, the following Order was passed: "No representation for petitioners. As a last chance, two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition." 2. Even today also the learned counsel for the petitioners is absent and the office objections have not yet been complied with. The criminal petition is of the year 2023 and it appears that the petitioners are not interesting in prosecuting the petition. 3. For the said reason, the Criminal Petition is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE CH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5