IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No. 89 of 2025. Decided on : 17 th March, 2025. Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd. ...Petitioner. Versus Suraj Kumar & Anr. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate. For the respondents: Nemo. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is under instructions not to press the instant petition as the same has been rendered infructuous due to intervening circumstances. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 17th March, 2025. (jai) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?