Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8782 (GAU)

NAYAN JYOTI BARMAN AND ORS v. SMTI PRANATI KHAUND AND ORS

I.A.(Civil)/776/2025 · 2025-03-25

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010025072025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A(Civil) No.776/2025 in WP(C)/668/2025 NAYAN JYOTI BARMAN AND ORS WIFE OF LATE BHUPEN CHANDRA KHAUND PERMANENT RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO.21 LAKHIMI NAGAR PATH HATIGAON GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN - 781006. 2: SRI MINARAM BHUYAN /O LATE BHOGESWAR BHUYAN R/O LAXMI NAGAR APARTMENT GFLAT NO. 401 LAKHIMINAGAR HATIGAON GUWAHATI-38 DISTRICT KAMRUP(M) ASSAM VERSUS SMTI PRANATI KHAUND AND ORS WIFE OF LATE BHUPEN CHANDRA KHAUND PERMANENT RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO.21 LAKHIMI NAGAR PATH HATIGAON GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM GUWAHATI DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Page No.# 2/3 DISPUR GUWAHATI - 781006 3:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM GUWAHATI DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006 4:THE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER GANESH MANDIR DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006 5:THE COMMISSIONER GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION GANESH MANDIR DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006 6:THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE GUWAHATI PANBAZAR GUWAHATI 781001 7:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE HATIGAON POLICE STATION HATIGAON MAIN ROAD GUWAHATI ASSAM 781038 8:DR. AMAL KUMAR BORPUJARI PROPRIETOR OF M/S A.B CONSTRUCTION AND HOUSING AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS SON OF LATE DURGESWAR BORPUJARI RESIDENT OF BISHNUJYOTI PATH HATIGAON ASSAM 781006 ------------ Advocate for : MS. ARPITA MAJUMDER Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for SMTI PRANATI KHAUND AND ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 26.03.2025 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. This is an application for impleadment of Sri Nayan Jyoti Page No.# 3/3 Barman and Sri Minaram Bhuyan as respondent Nos.6.1 & 6.2 in WP(C) No.668/2025. It is the claim of the applicants that their rights are also involved in adjudication of the connected writ petition. Mr. R.B. Phookan, learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that he has no objection in impleadment of the aforesaid respondents. Accordingly, the present application stands allowed. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner shall furnish a copy of the amended cause title to the learned counsel for the respondents as well to the registry by incorporating the name of respondent Nos.6.1 & 6.2 in the connected writ petition as per the extent norms and thereafter the registry to do the needful in this regard. Registry is directed to reflect the name of the newly impleaded respondent Nos.6.1 & 6.2 in the cause list. With the aforesaid, the instant interlocutory application stands allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant