APHC010095482025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5046/2025 Between: 1. MUTYALA LAKSHMI MANGATHAYARU, W/O.MUTYALA RAMA CHANDRA RAO, HOUSE NO.1-241,ROAD NO.1 N, BHAVANI NAGAR KAPRA, MEDCHEL MALKAZ GIRL DISTRICT, GREATER HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE, NATIVE OF PENUGONDA, PENUGONDA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, BHIMAVARAM. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, BHIMAVARAM. 4. THE SECRETARY/EXECUTIVE OFFICER, GRAM PANCHYAT PENUGONDA, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE GRAM PANCHAYAT, PENUGONDA REP BY ITS SARPANCH, PENUGONDA, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring inaction of the Respondents 1 to 3 against the representation dated 30-01-2025 of the petitioner by taking acting against respondent No.4, as the 4th respondent failed to handedover the building plan as per resolution No.60 dated 19-12-2024, as per the building plan dated 18-06-2024 submitted by the petitioner for construction of building in the site correlated to the layout plan FLP No.44/2021/1172/DTCP/DPMS, at Plot Nos.18 and 19, situated at Cherukuvada, Penugonda Village, Penugonda Mandal, at R.S.No.197-2,197- 3,198-1A,198-1B1,198- 2 are illegal and arbitrary, consequently direct the 4th respondent to furnish the building plan approved by the 5th respondent by fixing at an early date and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 not interfere with the building construction of the petitioner as per resolution No.60 dated 19-12-2024, as per the plan dated 18-06-2024 submitted by the petitioner in the site correlated to the layout plan of plot Nos. 18 & 19 situated at Penugonda Mandal, Penugonda Major Gram Panchayat, cherukuvada village, at R.S.No.197-2,197-3, 198-1 A, 198-161,198-2 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PECHATHY RANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION.NO.5046 OF 2025 ORDER:- The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in not taking any action on the respondent No.4, as the respondent No.4 failed to handover the building plan approved by the respondent No.5 as per the resolution dated 19.12.2024 as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development and learned Standing counsel for Gram Panchayat for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that claim of the petitioner was redressed by respondent No.4 by handing over the building plan as requested by the petitioner. Therefore, no further orders are necessary. 4. Recording the said submission, the present writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J Date:22.09.2025 BSP 23 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION.NO.5046 OF 2025 DATED:22.09.2025 BSP