Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87803 (ALL)

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/12092/2025 · 2025-08-21

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:145320 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12092 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Gopal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rama Nand Pandey Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard Mr. Krishna Gopal, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent, Mr. Rama Nand Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and perused the record. The petitioner has preferred instant writ petition for a direction upon respondent no.3 to decide the claim of the petitioner and grant trained grade pay from the date of initial appointment of the petitioner, i.e. 11.03.1996 alongwith arrears of the salary and a further prayer to direct the respondent no.3 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 26.12.2024, which is still pending. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has moved a representation before the respondent no.3 requesting to decide the claim of the petitioner for payment of trained grade pay from the date of initial appointment, but no decision has been taken till date. Learned counsel for the respondent no.3 submits that the controversy in question has already been settled, and in view thereof, the petitioner is not entitled to the relief as prayed. However, in case petitioner move fresh representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.3; District Basic Education Officer, Jhansi within two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 22.8.2025 Jitendra/- Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad