HARKESHBAHADUR SINGH v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/12135/2025 · 2025-08-22
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87789 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87789 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:146126 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12135 of 2025 Petitioner :- Harkeshbahadur Singh Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad Tiwari,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
"Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Respondent No. 3-Regional Joint Director of Education, Jhansi Region Jhansi/Chairman, Regional Regularization Committee for regularization of the petitioner as L.T. Grade Teacher in the institution namely Sri Maharshi Valmiki Inter College Khandeha, Chitrakoot in view of the judgment passed in Writ-A No. 21492 of 2023 (Vinod Kumar Srivastava vs. State of U.P. and others) and in pursuance of letter dated 23.01.2024 of Respondent No. 3 by considering the pending Representation dated 20.02.2025 of the petitioner as (Annexure no.24) with the writ Petition"
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner, without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner.
3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents No.1 to 5 vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
4. Heard Sri O.P. Singh, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri R.P.Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Sanjay Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel appeared, on advance
accepted notice, on behalf of the State-respondents No.1 to 5, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record.
5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.3 within 10 days from today. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.3, Regional Joint Director of Education, Jhansi Region, Jhansi/Regional Regularization Committee is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation.
6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
Order Date :- 23.8.2025 Kushal Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad