- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51866 WP No. 23097 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 23097 OF 2023 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. RUDRAPPA S/O LATE BENGALURU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO 57, 18TH CROSS ROAD, NEW RING ROAD, MALAGALA NAGARABHAVI 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 091 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ASHOK KUMAR.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NAVAKALYAN KARNATAKA SOUHDARDA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, REGIONAL OFFICE AT NO 277/27, 59TH CROSS, VITAL NAGARJ ROAD, 3RD BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 010 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES COURT (R441) ARBITRATION COURT, 3. RECOVERY OFFICER, DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES COURT (R441), BOTH OFFICE AT NO.68, 17 & 18TH CROSS, MARGOSA ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 055 Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51866 WP No. 23097 of 2023 SMT. PARVATHAMMA AND R.RAVI (DEFAULTER 2 &3) ARE THE GUARANTORS AND WIFE AND SON OF PETITIONER, HENCE, NOT MADE PARTY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR P PATIL., ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI. S.R. KHAMROZ KHAN, AGA FOR R2 & 3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SEIZER WARRANT ISSUED BY THE RECOVERY OFFICER (R441), THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES COURT DTD 27.07.2023 VIDE NO. EP NO. KA.RA.SOU.SAM.SA.NI.SA.SAM.SA.NI/VA.AA/199/2023-24 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING - INTERLOCUTORY APPLN, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation. The order sheet dated 18.11.2025 reads as under: " Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 and learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3 are present and submit in unison that since the condition imposed while granting interim order vide order dated 13.10.2023 was not complied with, this Court clarified the situation that the petitioner is not entitled for - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51866 WP No. 23097 of 2023 the benefit of interim order since he has not deposited 50% of the award amount as directed. Learned counsel submitted that writ petition itself is not maintainable since the petitioner has not invoked the efficacious remedy of preferring the appeal as provided under Section 46 of the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. However, to afford one more opportunity, list this matter on 02.12.2025." Even on the previous date of hearing i.e., on 08.04.2025, there was no representation. In view of the above, writ petition is disposed off. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to invoke Section 46 of the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997 in accordance with law, if he is advised to do so. In view of the disposal of the writ petition, pending IA No.1/2024 stands disposed off. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE BH CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3