Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8778 (BOM)

SUJIT SUNIL ITHAPE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

ABA/221/2025 · 2025-02-12

Shri Arun R Pedneker

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 904 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 221 OF 2025 SUJIT SUNIL ITHAPE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Vrishab Patil h/f. Mr. Jadhav Satej S APP for Respondent/State: Mr. N. B. Patil ... CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 12th FEBRUARY, 2025 PER COURT: 1. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that during pendency of the application, the applicant is arrested and has been granted regular bail. In view of the same, the application is rendered infructuous. 2. The Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed as infructuous. [ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] marathe 2025:BHC-AUG:3926