RSA-592 142 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Harjinder Singh and anr. Balwinder Singh and ors. CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) been laid to the judgments and decrees dated 31.05.2017 and 19.08.2021 passed by the Courts instance of respondent No.1 was partly decreed for refund of the earnest money along with interest. 2. the Executing Court, the parties have entered into a settlement terms thereof, only the last 3 the judgment debtor in favour of respondent No.1/ plaintiff. 3. not press the present Regular Second appeal. 4. 592-2022 (O&M) [1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** RSA Date of Decision: 27.08.2025 Harjinder Singh and anr. Versus Balwinder Singh and ors. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr.Rahul Arora, Advocate for the appellants. --- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present Regular Second Appeal, challenge has been laid to the judgments and decrees dated 31.05.2017 and 19.08.2021 passed by the Courts below; whereby suit filed at the instance of respondent No.1 was partly decreed for refund of the earnest money along with interest. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that before the Executing Court, the parties have entered into a settlement terms thereof, only the last 3rd instalement the judgment debtor in favour of respondent No.1/ plaintiff. In view thereof, learned counsel for the appellants does not press the present Regular Second appeal. Dismissed as not pressed. 1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-592-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.08.2025 …….Appellants Versus .….Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr.Rahul Arora, Advocate By way of present Regular Second Appeal, challenge has been laid to the judgments and decrees dated 31.05.2017 and below; whereby suit filed at the instance of respondent No.1 was partly decreed for refund of the Learned counsel for the appellants submits that before the Executing Court, the parties have entered into a settlement and in instalement of Rs.3 lakhs is payable by the judgment debtor in favour of respondent No.1/ plaintiff. In view thereof, learned counsel for the appellants does not press the present Regular Second appeal. ssed as not pressed. By way of present Regular Second Appeal, challenge has been laid to the judgments and decrees dated 31.05.2017 and below; whereby suit filed at the instance of respondent No.1 was partly decreed for refund of the Learned counsel for the appellants submits that before and in of Rs.3 lakhs is payable by In view thereof, learned counsel for the appellants does SANJAY GUPTA 2025.08.29 13:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-592 5. adhered to or any further cause survives, appellants shall be at liberty to seek revival of the present Regular Second Appeal. 6. disposed of. 27.08.2025 sanjay 592-2022 (O&M) [2 However, in case the terms of the adhered to or any further cause survives, appellants shall be at liberty to seek revival of the present Regular Second Appeal. Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also disposed of. 27.08.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? 2] However, in case the terms of the settlement are not adhered to or any further cause survives, appellants shall be at liberty to seek revival of the present Regular Second Appeal. Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Yes/No are not adhered to or any further cause survives, appellants shall be at liberty stand (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2025.08.29 13:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document