SANDEEP KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/22942/2025 · 2025-08-08
Vinod S Bhardwaj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87765 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87765 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 112
CWP-22942-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.08.2025
Sandeep Kumar and another
...Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
Present :- Mr. R.S. Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
*****
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)
1. Prayer in the present petition is for prohibiting the respondents from directing the petitioners to do excess over time beyond a period of 48 hours in a working week as per the law alongwith a further prayer for directing the respondents to give work charge only for a period of 48 hours in a working week and access to all public holidays which are admissible as per the Government notifications issued from time to time.
2. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to the grievance, the petitioners have already submitted a representation dated 20.01.2025 (Annexure P-1) but no action has been taken thereupon till date. He contends that the petitioners would be satisfied at this stage, in case respondent No.6-Block Development & Panchayat Officer, Radaur, District Yamuna Nagar is directed to consider and decide the said representation, in a time bound manner in accordance with law.
MANGAL SINGH 2025.08.11 12:03 I am the author of this document
2 112
CWP-22942-2025 (O&M)
3. Notice of motion.
4. Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG Haryana (through V.C.) accepts notice on behalf of the respondent(s)-State and prays for some time to complete instructions and file response, if necessary. She, however, does not have any objection to the above request.
5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with the consent of the parties and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, by directing respondent No.6-Block Development & Panchayat Officer, Radaur, District Yamuna Nagar to consider and decide the representation dated 20.01.2025 (Annexure P-1) and to pass a well reasoned and speaking order thereupon in accordance with law, expeditiously and preferably within a period of 04 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 08.08.2025
JUDGE Mangal Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
MANGAL SINGH 2025.08.11 12:03 I am the author of this document