Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8776 (AP)

Sri Kaalla Durga Prasad, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

CRLP/2028/2025 · 2025-03-10

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010096162025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2028/2025 Between: 1. SRI KAALLA DURGA PRASAD, S/O NARAYANAMURTHY, AGED 27 YEARS, R/O D.NO.2-173, ALLURI VAARI VEEDHI, MIRTHIPADU VILLAGE, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI. 2. SRI KALLA NAGENDRABABU, S/O NARAYANAMURTHY, AGED 25 YEARS, R/O D.NO.2-173, ALLURIVAARI VEEDHI, MIRTHIPADU VILLAGE, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI. 3. SRI KOTA GURU SIVA SATISH, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED 29 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-90, PATHURU, MIRTHIPADU VILLAGE, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAT 2. MEDE DURGA PRASAD, S/O VENKANNA, AGED 22 YEARS, R/O MIRTHIPADU VILLAGE, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. BONU RAMA SHANKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The present criminal appeal has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3 seeking to set aside the Order dated 22.02.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.181 of 2025 in Crime No.30 of 2025 on the file of the Court of 2 Special Judge for trial of cases under SCs & STs (PoA) Act-cum-X Additional District & Sessions Judge, Rajamahendravaram, and to release them on bail. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri B.Rama Shankar Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that they intend to withdraw the petition and hence the petition may be disposed of. 3. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view of the matter, the criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the Petitioners are at liberty to prefer appeal against the impugned order. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:10.03.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.2028 of 2025 Dt.10.03.2025 Dinesh