Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87757 (KAR)

SMT. VEENA SHREE S v. SRI.DEEPAK C

CP/216/2025 · 2025-11-10

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46699 CP No. 216 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL PETITION NO. 216 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. VEENA SHREE S. W/O DEEPAK C. D/O SHANTHAPPA K. SHIKARIPURA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O NO.404/94, JAYANAGARA, B BLOCK, HIGH TECH HOSPITAL ROAD, DAVANAGERE - 577 001 …PETITIONER (BY MS. BABY YADAV, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M.R. HIREMATHAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI DEEPAK C. AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, S/O CHENNAKESHVAIAH, NO.124, 3RD MAIN, MANJUNATHA NILAYA NAGANATHAPURA, HOSA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 100 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. C. THANGARAJU, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46699 CP No. 216 of 2025 THIS CIVIL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SEC. 24 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE. 1908 PRAYING TO TRANSFER THE CASE IN M.C.NO.713/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL AT BENGALURU TO THE FILE OF HONBLE FAMILY JUDGE COURT AT DAVANAGERE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER 1. Heard Miss Baby Yadav, for Sri. Hiremathad Maheshaiah Rudrayya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. C. Thangaraju, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Present Petition is filed by the wife under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure against her husband with the following prayer: "WHEREFORE, the petitioner humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass an order to : - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46699 CP No. 216 of 2025 Transfer the case in M.C.No.713 of 2024 on the file Hon'ble III Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural at Bengaluru to the file of Hon'ble Family Judge Court at Davanagere." 3. Facts in brief which are utmost necessary for the disposal of the present petition are as under: 3.1 The matrimonial relationship between the parties strained and husband has filed a petition for divorce on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bangalore Rural District in M.C. No.713/2024. 3.2 The wife/petitioner who is residing in Davangere seeks transfer of the said petition on the ground that she is unable to attend before the Court at Bangalore on account of financial constraints and geographical distance. 4. Counsel for respondent opposes the transfer grounds. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46699 CP No. 216 of 2025 5. It is now settled principles of law that geographical distance and financial constraints are no longer valid parameters for transfer of proceedings from one Court to another Court in view of the video conferencing facility. 6. If the petitioner files an application before the Trial Court at Bangalore Rural District seeking permission to appear through video conferencing, learned Trial Judge shall allow the petitioner to appearing through video conferencing. 7. With that observation, the following Order: ORDER Civil Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC CT-SG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32