Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87748 (ALL)

RAMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/28291/2025 · 2025-08-21

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:145811 Court No. - 77 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28291 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rama And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Balbir Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital/live-in life of petitioners, has been sought. 3. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No. 138 of 2025, under Section 87 BNS, Police Station-Sahpau, District-Hathras, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 22.8.2025 #Vik/- Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad