P. VANITHA v. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
WP Crl./629/2025 · 2025-08-20
N Sathish Kumar
Writ Petition (Criminal)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87743 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87743 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.Crl.No.629 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.08.2025 CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR W.P.Crl.No.629 of 2025 P.Vanitha ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The District Superintendent of Police, O/o. The District Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur District.
2. The Inspector of Police, C-1, Uthukottai Police Station, Thiruvallur District – 602 026.
3. M.Manikandan ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition (Criminal) is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus or direction in the nature of writ, to direct the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 04.02.2024 and initiate suitable proceedings against the third respondent in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Bharathy For R1 & R2 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Additional Public Prosecutor 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.No.629 of 2025 O R D E R The Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed seeking a direction to the second respondent Police to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 04.02.2024 and initiate suitable proceedings against the third respondent in accordance with law.
2. The contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that, after the demise of the petitioner's husband, the third respondent and his family failed to return the petitioner's jewels and the property share belonging to the petitioner's husband. Hence, the petitioner has made a representation to the second respondent. Since no action was taken, the present petition has been filed.
3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first and the second respondents submitted that the CSR registered on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner has been closed.
4. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.No.629 of 2025
5. The very representation of the petitioner itself indicates that the petitioner seeks to establish her civil rights through the respondent Police, which cannot be permitted.
6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition (Criminal) stands dismissed. However, it is open to the petitioner to work out her remedy in accordance with law. No costs. 20.08.2025 ham Neutral Citation:Yes/No To
1. The District Superintendent of Police, O/o. The District Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur District.
2. The Inspector of Police, C-1, Uthukottai Police Station, Thiruvallur District – 602 026.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.No.629 of 2025 N. SATHISH KUMAR
, J.
ham W.P.Crl.No.629 of 2025 20.08.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis