Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
263 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
Ramji Dass and others State of Punjab and another
CORAM:
Present:
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
No. 6957 of 2013
July 25, 2025 'Sumit Gusain'
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA
Date of Decision: 25.07.2025 Ramji Dass and others Vs.
State of Punjab and another
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Mr. H.K. Aurora, Advocate,
Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate,
Mr. Hemant Sarin, Advocate,
Mr. R.K. Chauhan, Advocate,
Mr. S.K. Kanojia, Advocate,
Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate,
for the appellant(s)/landown
X-objectors/respondent(s).
Mr. Bhanu Partap Singh, Advocate,
for respondent No.1.
(in RFA-10437-2014).
Mr. Gunjan Mehta, AAG, Punjab.
**** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
For detailed order, see judgment of even date passed in No. 6957 of 2013 titled “Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Punjab and others” July 25, 2025
( HARKESH MANUJA) 'Sumit Gusain'
Whether Speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-962-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.07.2025 .......... Appellants .......... Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. H.K. Aurora, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate, Mr. Hemant Sarin, Advocate, Mr. R.K. Chauhan, Advocate, Mr. S.K. Kanojia, Advocate, Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate, for the appellant(s)/landowners/ objectors/respondent(s). Mr. Bhanu Partap Singh, Advocate, Mr. Gunjan Mehta, AAG, Punjab. For detailed order, see judgment of even date passed in RFA
“Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Punjab and others”.
( HARKESH MANUJA)
JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
.......... Appellants .......... Respondents
RFA .
SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.08.05 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document