Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8773 (UTT)

RITIK MISHRA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C482/1233/2024 · 2025-05-22

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS C482 No.1233 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Siddharth Bankoti, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, along with Mr. Vikas Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. None present for the private respondent. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has got no instructions in the matter any longer. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the applicant, the present C482 application is dismissed for non-prosecution. 6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 22.05.2025 AK