DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK THROUGH THE BRANCH MANAGER NAMELY ANIL KUMAR SUNNY AGED ABOUT 37 YRS v. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA.
CR. WJC/54/2024 · 2025-07-28
Sandeep Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87728 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87728 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.54 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Begusarai ====================================================== DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK THROUGH THE BRANCH MANAGER NAMELY ANIL KUMAR SUNNY AGED ABOUT 37 YRS S/O CHANDESHWARI PRASAD, DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK, BISHNUPUR BRANCH BEGUSARAI, P.S- BEGUSARAI TOWN, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. BIHAR
2.
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BEGUSARAI. BIHAR
3.
THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, BEGUSARAI. BIHAR
4.
THE S.H.O, BEGUSARAI TOWN POLICE STATION, BEGUSARAI. BIHAR
5.
M/S OM FOOD PROCESSING PVT. LTD. THROUGH DIRECTORS CHANDRADEEP KUMAR AND SAVITA DEVI N/A
6.
M/S OM FOOD PRODUCTS INDUSTRIES LTD. THROUGH PROPRIETOR CHANDRADEEP KUMAR N/A
7.
SRI CHANDRADEEP KUMAR S/O SRI SIYARAM SINGH R/O LAKHO, W/N-14, PACHPAN TOLA, P.S- MUFASIL, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI.
8.
SMT. SAVITA DEVI W/O SRI CHANDRADEEP KUMAR R/O LAKHO, W/N-14, PACHPAN TOLA, P.S- MUFASIL, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Pandey For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sc.6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 28-07-2025 Heard the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw this application as the same has now become infructuous.
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.54 of 2024(2) dt.28-07-2025 2/2
3. The State counsel has no object to the withdrawal of the present writ application.
4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U