Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87721 (ALL)

ARVIND KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/12088/2025 · 2025-08-21

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:144562 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12088 of 2025 Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Shukla Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kuldeep Singh Chauhan Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Sri Saurabh Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Kuldeep Singh Chauhan, Advocate for Respondent-2. 2. Petitioner claims that his case falls within the norms of Government Order dated 24.02.2016 that he may be considered for regularization. Learned counsel for petitioner refers the averments and documents annexed alongwith this writ petition in support of his claim. 3. Learned counsel for respondents refers that there are certain conditions prescribed in the said notification and for that petitioner has to come up with a specific case that not only he was initially qualified for the post of Driver as well as that concerned Respondent-U.P. Khadi and Gramodyog Board, has financial position to take burden of outcome of regularization. He also submits that claim of a similarly situated Driver, Sri Ranvijay Singh, was already rejected by this Court by a reasoned order dated 01.04.2024 that said Government Order is not applicable on respondents. 4. I have considered the above submissions and on basis of above reference this writ petition is disposed of that concerned respondent will have liberty to consider the claim of petitioner and in case of any legal impediment, such as the decision on claim of similarly situated other Driver, the same be communicated to the petitioner within a short period. Order Date :- 22.8.2025 AK Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad