[2025:RJ-JP:13059] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3723/2025 1. Kumparam Son Of Budharam, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Richholi Patodi, District Balotara (Raj.) 2. Sohan Lal Son Of Chhogaram, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Mevanagar, District Balotara (Raj.) 3. Anil Das Son Of Haridas, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Asada, Balotara, District Balotara (Raj.) 4. Bharat Panwar Son Of Choutharam Panwar, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Near Mali Samaj Bhawan, Gandhipur, Balotara (Raj.) 5. Moolaram Son Of Jagrooparam, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Bairado Ki Dhani, Bayatu Bhopaji, Delu, Barmer (Raj.) 6. Arjun Ram Son Of Okharam, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 2, Meghwalo Ka Vas, Parlu, District Balotara (Raj.) 7. Rajesh Panchal Son Of Mohan Lal, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Meghwalo Ka Vas, Tapra, District Balotara (Raj.) 8. Suresh Kumar Son Of Paras Mal, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Khariyo Ka Tanka, Ward No. 2, Bhurdan Ji Ki Gali, Balotara (Raj.) 9. Vedratan Arya Son Of Chanana Ram Arya, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Rajaram Chatrawas Ke Piche, Samdari Road, Gandhipura, Ward No. 29, Balotara Rural, District Balotara (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Skill, Planning Andentrepreneurship, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Director, Directorate Of Technical Education, (Training, E-6, Residence Road, Jodhpur (Raj.) 4. The Assistant Director/superintendent Cum Principal, [2025:RJ-JP:13059] (2 of 2) [CW-3723/2025] Government Iti College, Balotara. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.G. S. Gauttam JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 24/03/2025 1. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to submit a detailed comprehensive representation, before the respondent-authorities for redressal of their grievances. 2. The instant writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. 3. In case, any representation is submitted by the petitioner within a period of one month from today, it is expected from the respondents to decide the same strictly in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months thereafter. 4. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not passed any order or direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners in a particular way. They would be at liberty to decide the same, strictly in accordance with law. 5. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /13