IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No.62 of 2024 in CWPOA No.6576 of 2019 Decided on: 20.06.2025 Sh. Pritam Singh … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Babita, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Advocate General has handed over a copy of instructions received from Divisional Forest Officer, Nahan Forest Division, which is taken on record. In terms of the instructions, the services of the petitioner have been converted to work charge status w.e.f 01.01.2003. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it be observed that consequential benefits be released in favour of the petitioner as early as possible. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 3. Learned Advocate General submits that the consequential benefits which may be accruable to the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Suraj Mani’s Case will be released in his favour in due course. Let needful be done within a period of three months from today. 4. Petition stands disposed of, so also pending miscellaneous applications, if any. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 20, 2025 (Vinod)