DINESH FAUZDAR AND ORS v. STATE MEDICAL AND HEALTHORS
CW/7183/2014 · 2025-02-20
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8771 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8771 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:7774] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7183/2014
1. Dinesh Fauzdar S/o Shri Mansingh, Bhiwar Bari, Near Jat Athai, Bayana, District Bharatpur.
2. Lokendra Kumar S/o Shri Om Prakash, Lal Darwaja, Old Sabji Mandi Road, Bayana, District Bharatpur.
3. Raman Lal Sharma S/o Shri Jagdish Sharma, Village And Post Kair, Tehsil Bayana, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary , Department Of Medical And Health Services, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Director, Medical And Health Services, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.
3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bharatpur.
4. Medical Officer Incharge, Primary Health Centre, Kalsada, Bayana, District Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr.Prakhar Jain for Mr.Archit Bohra, Addl.GC.
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 20/02/2025
1. By way of filing this instant writ petition, a challenge has been made to the impugned order dated 28.05.2014 passed by the respondents by which the tender offered by a placement agency has been discontinued and fresh NITs have been invited for appointment on the post of Wardboy, Cleaner, Computer Operator.
[2025:RJ-JP:7774] (2 of 2) [CW-7183/2014]
2. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order passed by the respondents, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing this petition, this Court while issuing notice to the respondents on 20.06.2014 has issued a direction to the respondents that in case, they required to avail the services of wardboy/ Sweeper on the post held by the petitioner, preference be given to the petitioner.
3. No interim order has been passed in his favour, hence under the changed circumstances and by efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous.
4. The instant writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
5. However, it is observed that if any preference has been given by the respondents/ NGOs in service to the petitioner in pursuance of the order dated 20.06.2014 passed by this Court, the respondents may proceed and grant him accordingly.
6. Stay application and all applications (pending, if any) also stand dismissed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma/107