Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 87709 (PNJ)

GURPREET RAM PANCH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORTHERS

CWP/22482/2025 · 2025-08-05

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[125] Gurpreet Ram Panch, Gram Panchayat District SBS Nagar, Punjab State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: DEEPAK SIBAL [1] would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. Nagar, to take a decision on the (Annexure [2] objection if the above prayer is accepted. [3] of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a d No.6-District Development and Panchayat Officer, SBS Nagar, decision on the aforesaid speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably order. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22482 Date of Decision : Gurpreet Ram Panch, Gram Panchayat, District SBS Nagar, Punjab versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Mr. Navraj Singh Mahal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shekhar Verma, Addl. A.G., Punjab. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.6-District Development and Panchayat Officer, SBS to take a decision on the (Annexure P-5) moved by the petitioner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a d District Development and Panchayat Officer, SBS Nagar, decision on the aforesaid application moved by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 22482-2025 Date of Decision : 05.08.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL SUBHAS MEHLA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shekhar Verma, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction District Development and Panchayat Officer, SBS to take a decision on the application dated 22.04.2025 ved by the petitioner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent District Development and Panchayat Officer, SBS Nagar, to take a moved by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this that at this stage he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction District Development and Panchayat Officer, SBS 22.04.2025 Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits respondent to take a moved by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.08.05 20:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-22482-2025 -2- [4] Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the same is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 05.08.2025 ‘R. Sharma' Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.08.05 20:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document