1 Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:90837 Reserved On:- 22.05.2025 Delivered On:- 27.05.2025 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31151 of 2024 Applicant :- Nikhil Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jai Prakash,Nafees Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mayank Yadav,Vivek Kumar Singh Hon'ble Siddharth, J. 1. Heard Sri Nafees Ahmad, learned counsel for the applicant; Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the informant; learned A.G.A for the State and perused the material placed on record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Nikhil, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 705 of 2023, under Sections- 302, 392 and 411 IPC, P.S.- Kankar Kheda, District- Meerut. 3. Bail application of co-accused, Arti, has been rejected by the order of date passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10788 of 2024 is quoted hereinbelow :- “1. Heard Sri Nafees Ahmad, learned counsel for the applicant; Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the informant; learned A.G.A for the State and perused the material placed on record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Arti, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime 2 No. 705 of 2023, under Sections- 302, 392 and 411 IPC, P.S.- Kankar Kheda, District- Meerut. 3. There are allegations in the F.I.R that the applicant and her husband, Nikhil, were tenants in the accommodation provided by the informant. The applicant and co-accused were not paying rent of the rented accommodation to the informant due to which dispute took place. The applicant and her husband, Nikhil, allegedly strangulated the deceased wife of informant to death by her dupatta. 4. In view of the above, this Court after hearing the learned counsels for the parties does not finds any ground for enlarging the applicant also on bail at this stage. 5. The bail application is accordingly, rejected. 6. The trial court is directed to conclude the trial against the applicant as expeditiously as possible as per Section 309 Cr.P.C. (new Section 346 B.N.S.S.).” 4. In view of the above order passed in bail application of co-accused, Arti, in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10788 of 2024, this Court after hearing the learned counsels for the parties does not finds any ground for enlarging the applicant also on bail at this stage. 5. The bail application is accordingly, rejected. 6. The trial court is directed to conclude the trial against the applicant as expeditiously as possible as per Section 309 Cr.P.C. (new Section 346 B.N.S.S.). Order Date :- 27.05.2025 Rohit Digitally signed by :- ROHIT DAS High Court of Judicature at Allahabad