AMREEN BANO @ GUDIYA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS
CRLP/18154/2025 · 2025-08-19
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Vivek Kumar Birla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87704 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 87704 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:142338-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18154 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amreen Bano @ Gudiya Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar Singh,Shailendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.
1. Shri Shailendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner is praying for adjournment on the ground that Shri Pankaj Kumar Singh, who is also appearing with him is not available.
2. Present petition has been filed seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 to conduct fair and proper investigation in Case Crime no.0014 of 2024, under Sections 498-A, 323, 354(K), 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Mahila Thana, District Fatehpur and arrest the respondent no.4 to 9 in pursuance of the aforesaid FIR.
3. Learned AGA opposed the prayer and pointed out that present petition itself is not maintainable inasmuch as after investigation chargesheet had already been submitted in the Court whereon cognizance had already been taken by the court concerned on 18.07.2024.
4. We find substance in the objection raised by the learned AGA. Therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition.
5. The writ petition is according dismissed. However, leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the remedy as may be available to the petitioner in accordance with law. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 Nitendra Digitally signed by :- NITENDRA TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad