CWP-15714-2013 101-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT UNION OF INDIA CHANAN SINGH CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR Present: Mr. Rishav Sharma, Advocate for the applicant/respondent No.1. Mr. Pankaj Gupta, for the petitioner SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) 1. Application has been filed order passed by this Court in India connected writ petitions, decided on 10.02.2025 2. Both the counsel are petition can be adjudicated in terms of order passed by this Court in Ram Sanji 3. We had, in the aforesaid writ petitions after considering the law as laid down from time to time by the Apex Court, directed as under: 2013 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Vs. CHANAN SINGH AND ANOTHER **** HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA **** Mr. Rishav Sharma, Advocate for the applicant/respondent No.1. Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Sr. Panel Counsel for the petitioners/UOI. **** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) Application has been filed for disposal of writ petition in terms of order passed by this Court in CWP-11626 and others vs. Ram Sanjiw connected writ petitions, decided on 10.02.2025 Both the counsel are ad idem that the issue raised in the present petition can be adjudicated in terms of order passed by this Court in Ram Sanjiwan (supra). We had, in the aforesaid writ petitions after considering the law as laid down from time to time by the Apex Court, directed as under: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-9014-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-15714-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.07.2025 . . . . Petitioners . . . . Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA for the applicant/respondent No.1. Sr. Panel Counsel, Advocate SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) for disposal of writ petition in terms of 11626-2020 titled as ‘Union of wan and another’ and other connected writ petitions, decided on 10.02.2025. that the issue raised in the present petition can be adjudicated in terms of order passed by this Court in We had, in the aforesaid writ petitions after considering the law as laid down from time to time by the Apex Court, directed as under: in/and (O&M) .2025 s s for disposal of writ petition in terms of 2020 titled as ‘Union of an and another’ and other that the issue raised in the present petition can be adjudicated in terms of order passed by this Court in We had, in the aforesaid writ petitions after considering the law as laid MOHIT GOYAL 2025.07.08 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-15714-2013 to take a fresh law as laid down by the Hon’ble Jaggo case Nigam, Ghaziabad, Civil Appeal Nos.8158 decided The decisi positively. 4. Present writ petition is accordingly taken within one month as directed above. 5. Application No. 6. All pending applications 07.07.2025 Mohit goyal 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? 2013 (O&M) “9. In view of the above, we direct the appellant(s) to take a fresh decision and also take into consideration law as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Jaggo case (supra) and Shripal and another v. Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad, Civil Appeal Nos.8158 decided on 31.01.2025. 10. The writ petition(s) are accordingly disposed of. The decision shall now be taken within one month positively.” Present writ petition is accordingly disposed of taken within one month as directed above. Application No.CM-9014-CWP-2025 stands allowed accordingly. All pending applications also stand disposed of. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No 2. Whether reportable? Yes/No 9. In view of the above, we direct the appellant(s) decision and also take into consideration the Apex Court in the case of Shripal and another v. Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad, Civil Appeal Nos.8158-8179 of 2024, 10. The writ petition(s) are accordingly disposed of. shall now be taken within one month disposed of. Decision shall now be taken within one month as directed above. stands allowed accordingly. also stand disposed of. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No . Decision shall now be MOHIT GOYAL 2025.07.08 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document